Published verbatim, answered the same way we would answer them on a call.
That fear is earned, and the causes are specific rather than mysterious: built to a vendor template that never fit the sources, no schema validation so errors corrupt reports silently, nobody owning integrity after launch, and a scope the business could never sustain. We name all five in the guide, each with what we do differently, so you can hold us to it.
That is a good starting point, not an embarrassing one. The assessment maps what you have today and what a right-sized platform looks like for a team your size, with senti on top so the manual grind ends rather than moving somewhere else.
Not custom-everything. A proven build pattern fitted to your sources, which is what gives you packaged-rollout speed with a perfect-fit result. The scoping conversation is about what your business can sustain after we leave, not about the largest thing we could build.
Single-tool assistants answer inside one tool and assume the schema is clean. senti reasons across sources, validates the conclusion before you see it, and gives the same answer when you ask twice. If your question only ever touches one clean table, you may not need us.
Then keep them. senti is additive: it clears the backlog of export requests so your analysts do analysis instead of pulling spreadsheets. The people who benefit most are usually the ones who were never going to file a ticket in the first place.
Read-only by design, so there is no write path to misconfigure. Your data stays in your environment and only metadata leaves. Access is governed to industry best practices for data security, and every question, query, and result is logged and reviewable.
working toward soc 2 type 2 readiness. baa in place for healthcare.
Bring it to the call. If the honest answer is that we are not a fit, you will hear that instead of a pitch.